The final three months are where margins go to die
For Tier 1 contractors, this is a structure problem, not a contractor problem.
3 min read
When building technology is treated as a subcontract package rather than a digital integration responsibility, the problems do not show up until the end.
The BMS, the AV, the IT, the access control — specified separately, installed separately, and expected to talk to each other at practical completion. They almost never do first time.
The result is what every main contractor and M&E director already knows. Too many bodies on site during commissioning. Scope gaps that nobody owns. Interoperability failures that delay PC. Defects that drag into the twelve-month period and eat into a margin that was already thin.
This is not a contractor problem. It is a structure problem.
The digital data integration environment on a complex project needs one accountable owner from day one. Not a collection of subcontractors pointing at each other when something does not work.
At OKTO we own that environment. Every system, every interface, every integration point, all of it resolved at our OKTOLabs facility before it reaches site. By the time our systems arrive on a project they are not being commissioned. They are being optimised.
The final three months look completely different when the hard work has already been done.
“This is not a contractor problem. It is a structure problem.”
Delivering a project where a bad handover is not an option?
Put one accountable owner across the digital environment, from the first integration decision through handover.
Discuss your project
